There is this conservative, relatively young, webcaster that I've had the pleasure to argue with on a webcast --- Josh Kropkof, that posed an interesting question on his Facebook recently. It was after they found Casey's mom not guilty of the most heinous counts. He said “I'm kind of sick of hearing the media coverage about the Casey Anthony case at this point..but hearing it gave me two ironic questions. 1. Since when does the liberal media favor the death penalty? This was a death penalty case and they have been outraged by the verdict and apparently want this woman burned at the stake.” I found this interesting. Although I consider myself a rather independent voice and have no problem criticizing Democrats as well as Republicans, I know that some of my very conservative family and friends consider me liberal. I'm not a big fan of the death penalty but as you can see from this link I have advocated for it before, right here on this blog: http://heres-to-your-health-america.blogspot.com/2007/03/by-curt-anderson-associated-press.html sadly, there is a case in the news right now that is of the same heinous nature.
So I thought about what Josh said and I wondered is it liberal to be against the death penalty? There are several arguments against the death penalty but they don't seem to be particularly partisan to me. Of the two that seem the most relevant to me, if anything one is often associated with a group that votes conservatively, and the other should be associated with anybody who is intelligent and worries about justice. The first argument is made by those who consider themselves religious people. It's not our place to take another's life. Besides lowering ourselves to the level of the killers; “Vengeance is mine, sayeth the Lord”. Now a lot of people who consider themselves particularly religious in American vote conservatively. Sure, a lot of them don't, but a lot do, so if anything this could be considered a conservative viewpoint.
My view on the issue is more pragmatic. There have been 272 post-conviction DNA exoneration in the United States. The first DNA exoneration took place in 1989. Exoneration have been won in 34 states; since 2000, there have been 205 exoneration. 17 of the 272 people exonerated through DNA served time on death row. Besides DNA, there have been well over 100 additional other evidence or confession based DEATH ROW exoneration---35 of those just between Florida and Texas; two states so anxious to remove bad people from this Earth--- that they don't always make sure they're bad first!*
In cases where the evidence is incontrovertible an argument can be made on either side of the death penalty. There is something to be said about the cognitive and moral discomfort associated with murdering murderers. There is something to be said about the religious implications and I'm not the one to have that theological debate. On the other hand, we can argue that these most vile of criminals must remain imprisoned for life and therefore that will cost the state a lot of money and then we always have to worry that they will be freed somehow in the future, possibly by escape. Execution means we never have to worry about them or spend another dime on them again. In cases of incontrovertible proof I think there are many good arguments to be made and I think that each community must make its own decisions based on its own faith and feelings of morality. However, there has been enough exoneration utilizing DNA evidence as well as simple good detective work after the fact that we have shown that our legal system is not perfect--- and---after all--- you just can't take back an execution!
Josh, being in his 20’s, when the average age of those exonerated is 27, should take solace in the fact that not everyone pushes the death penalty, because, heaven forbid, should he or his friends ever be traveling late at night and get picked out by mistake and railroaded in a less-than-perfect legal system, he may be grateful for the time to pursue exoneration. I remember coming home late one night and as I walked through the streets of Brooklyn I was stopped by several police officers who made me stand in front of their car, bathed in the headlights, because I matched the description given by somebody who had just been attacked. They were now sitting in that police vehicle. I realized then and there that at the very least, if the victim thought I looked familiar, I could be spending the night in jail--- and only the night if I was lucky! Sure, I had been with a friend earlier and had an alibi, but I also had driven back to Brooklyn and taken up almost an hour to find a parking space. That might've been enough unverifiable time to have committed the crime! Clearly, one of the strongest things I had going in my favor, besides the fact that I was not actually involved in the incident, was that I was in Brooklyn and not Florida or Texas! (The victim did not recognize me as the perpetrator and I was free to go).
Anyway , I started this piece by talking about the conservative webcaster Josh Kropkof and I should mention that right now while I wanted to provide info for those readers who are interested in the conservative view, Josh's show is on hiatus, but here is a link to it so you can be updated: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/friday-11 However, separate from his webcast I happen to personally know from actual experience that Josh is a fine and entertaining magician. If you are in the Northeast, or if it's worth it to you to provide travel expenses for a very special show for corporate purposes, or your nonprofit fundraising, or just to celebrate a personal occasion for you or your family, you might want to check out his website: http://www.joshismagic.com
you can get in contact with him through his website and then you can always request that he update you should he bring his show back to the net. Let Josh know you heard about him from this blog. I know this blog had been quiet for a while and the viewers had fallen low because of it. I am pleased to say because of the work that has been published by Yahoo that has links on this blog and has this blog attributed on the author profile, views of Here’s-to-your-health-America are back up! We have more new views than we have in years. The Yahoo content links and profile link can be found on various posts as well as on the sidebar of this blog.
*Info gathered from The Innocence Project and the ACLU.
Tuesday, July 12, 2011
Friday, July 08, 2011
Make no mistake, if the Republicans force the unprecedented need for drastic spending cuts because they wont raise the debt ceiling, they will pay for it at the polls. The talk is that since the economy apparently stalled with the bad jobs report today, that the Republicans should just stand firm because they don't need to give anything to Obama because he's the one who's going to get blamed anyway. Although the public does not seem to be happy with Obama trying to fix the recession, polls clearly show that the public clearly remembers the economy tanked and the recession dug in under the Republicans and President Bush. From the time of Reagan through today spending and stimulus has been the biggest motivator of economic recovery. While Reagan also had tax cuts, and during the recovery saw tax revenue rise, he also saw deficits climb eightfold. The reason was all the spending the government had to do to stimulate the economy out of that recession. It is not a surprise that this recession has been more stubborn because it is the worst recession since the Great Depression. Every objective economic body has stated that the stimulus stopped this recession from having much greater unemployment levels that could have possibly spiraled down into a depression. It took all of this just to move us a bit forward. Now we need to do more not less. In the recovery revenues would rise and the need for some of the government spending would shrink and we would see deficits quickly shrink like they did during Clinton in the 90s. That's because his tax cuts were much more targeted towards encouraging investment and business expansion. The Republicans got that tax cuts under Bush and kept them under Obama and it did not stimulate the economy under Bush, it did not stop us from spiraling into deep recession under Bush and it has not added much to the recovery for Obama. If tax cuts are the answer would've worked for Bush. If worrying about overspending was the issue for the Republicans they should've said something when Bush was creating all these gigantic deficits. To complain about deficits now when we need to be spending to get ourselves out of the worst recession since the depression clearly shows how the Republicans are out of touch with mainstream America, the needs of the middle class and the actual workings of the economy. If they slash spending now and stop stimulating the economy what do they think they will be preserving if we go into a double dip recession and head towards depression? Just as lax conservative policies have allowed earnings and jobs to go offshore reducing the ranks of the middle class, a devastating double dip recession now would diminish those ranks much further. If the middle class goes, so goes the wealthy. Who does the daily work, who spends the money and buys the products and services? The middle class. We need a compromise now from the government that continues to stimulate the economy while making real inroads into reining in spending. Corporate earnings have been good, productivity is good and the rich are doing very well. Corporations and the wealthiest are sitting on these are earnings and seem to be riding out the rocky economy instead of trying to do their part to invigorate it. This is a mistake because if the economy falters, business will find itself back in the mess they were experiencing two years ago. The American people are not stupid. They don't have blinders on. They may get frustrated easily and polls may show they are not happy that Obama hasn't been able to do more for the economy, but those same polls show they still know where the roots of all this trouble began. The Republicans are trying to push the same failed policies that created this mess. If we don't have cooperation and a government that is working together to move the people and the economy ahead, the Republicans should not for a minute think that Obama will bear all the blame! The end is near...but will it be the end of the weak economy as we move forward, or the end of the weak recovery as we fall back into recession?